Some food would contribute to reduce the risks of breast cancer, while others would aggravate them, even at the women whom there is predisposed genetically, conclude researchers of the university of Montreal.
Vishnu Bissonauth, student to the doctorate to the Department of nutrition, is one of the authors of the survey. It counted 24 epidemiological studies treating the relation between the breast cancer and different groups of food, published between 1997 and 2007. Although several studies arrive to opposite results, the searcher arrives to the following findings:
The fruits and vegetables would have a preventive effect more marked among the women bearers of genetic mutations.
The photometer, contained in food to basis of soy or seeds of linen, would especially reduce the risks of breast cancer at the women. The protective effect of the weak dairy products in greasiness would be attributable to their content in D. vitamin
The red meats would increase the risk of breast cancer, especially if they are grilled rather than muses, and again more among the women bearers of genetic anomalies.
Fish would have a protective beneficial effect against the breast cancer. The effect varies according to the species and their fashion of cooking, with the exception of fish contaminated by heavy metals or pesticides.
Beyond food themselves, the total quantity of calories ingested per day could accelerate the apparition of the breast cancer. Several studies demonstrate that those that consume more than 2 000 calories per day, that they are bearers or no of genetic mutations, would run more risks to be reached of a breast cancer.
Vishnu Bissonauth recalls that a food cannot provoke, warn or aggravate to it only the breast cancer.
” For example, the fact to eat meat grilled to the barbecue during all one summer doesn’t immediately drive to the formation of a cancer. The breast cancer is a latent illness that sometimes takes about ten years before appearing.
Equipment Leasing Blunders That Can Cost Your Firm a Mint
Rod McHenry, the financial vice president of a document imaging company, thought he had great cause for celebrating. He had signed an unbelievable $370,000 lease proposal covering computer servers, workstations, software and other networking equipment. McHenry believed he had snared an incredible lease rate, capping off weeks of negotiating an acceptable equipment price with the equipment vendor. The proposal guaranteed a lease closing and offered a return of the 2% commitment fee’ paid by McHenry’s company if the leasing company failed to give credit approval within two weeks. Little did McHenry know that signing this proposal would lead his company into the Twilight Zone’ of equipment leasing. Ultimately, his firm would fork out more than $15,000 in legal fees seeking lessor performance, only to learn that the lessor was already insolvent and mired in several similar lawsuits.
Like McHenry’s employer, thousands of U.S. companies lease equipment each year, many of them without careful attention to potential blunders. Rod McHenry became victim to one possible pitfall, but there are several areas deserving careful attention.
Falling For the Lowest Rate
One potential pot-hole facing many would-be lessees is basing their lease decision solely on the lowest monthly payment. Even on the face of it, making a decision based on the monthly payment makes little sense. First, these amounts give only a partial picture of total lease pricing. An accurate discounting of cash flows using a present value analysis, including up-front lease payments, monthly payments, security deposits and fees can often change the outcome of the lowest lease bid. Making sure that each lease proposal is reduced to a present value calculation guarantees that you will be comparing apples to apples. Even if you make accurate price comparisons, pricing all by itself fails to consider several important factors ones that might save you a bundle in the long run and keep your firm from blundering. To avoid pitfalls in this area, list and evaluate your top priorities for a leasing arrangement. Consider factors such as: choosing the right leasing partner, balance sheet considerations, tax considerations, choosing the right form of lease, avoiding severe lease terms, and getting enough lease flexibility.
Failing to Check Lessors’ References and Financial Condition
As Rod McHenry discovered, perhaps the area with the greatest potential for a misstep is lessor selection. Failing to investigate and make a wise choice of leasing partner can result in transaction delay, misrepresentations, nonperformance, unexpected fees or even fraud. Like many industries, equipment leasing encompasses many players with varying degrees of experience, specialization, integrity and financial strength. In selecting the best leasing partner, get sufficient information from bidders to perform an effective reference check. If possible, also obtain financial information from bidding lessors to evaluate their financial condition. Obtain Dunn and Bradstreet reports on each bidder. Ask for and check customer, vendor, bank and trade references. Perform an Internet news and message board search to make sure the bidding lessors are not the subject of any unresolved problems or scandals. Most reputable lessors belong to one of the major equipment leasing trade associations (ELA, EAEL, UAEL, or NAELB). Call the appropriate association for a reference. Lastly, ask around. Check with your attorney, accounting firm, banker, friends and associates who are able to make recommendations based on past experiences.
Not Fully Understanding the Lease Agreement
Failing to read and understand the major terms and conditions of the equipment lease can cost your company a bundle. While most lease agreements include similar terms and conditions, there can be noticeable differences. For example, most agreements cover the lessee’s responsibility to pack the equipment and ship it to the lessor at the end of the lease, if the lessee chooses to return the equipment. Some leases require the lessee to have this done by the last day of the lease, perhaps depriving the lessee of a week or more of use. Also, some agreements require the lessee to pay for equipment de-installation, packing and shipping to any destination within the US, which can be costly. You can save money by negotiating many of these points. Read the lease agreement thoroughly, get legal advice if necessary, and negotiate points that can save you money.
Making the Wrong Choice Between Fair Market Value and Bargain Purchase Leases
High on the list of potential leasing blunders is choosing the wrong form of lease for your planned use of the equipment. Failure to choose wisely can result in significant additional lease expense. Equipment leases fall into two broad categories: 1) leases designed to pass ownership of the equipment to the lessee at the end of the lease (bargain purchase/capital leases) and 2) leases intended to allow the leasing company to retain ownership of the equipment (FMV or operating leases).
If you plan to keep the equipment beyond the term of the lease, it is generally cheaper to enter into a bargain purchase/capital lease. During the lease, you pay the lessor a rate of return plus the cost of the equipment. At the end of the lease, you receive the equipment title for a nominal payment. If the equipment is subject to rapid obsolescence or if you feel confident that you will return the equipment at the end of the lease, a FMV or operating lease might prove advantageous. What you are getting in a FMV or operating lease is the flexibility to kick the equipment out at lease end. Additionally, this form of lease can lower your lease rate as the lessor passes a portion of the anticipated residual value back to your firm in the form of lower payments. If your firm has reason to minimize liabilities appearing on the balance sheet, perhaps due to bank financial covenants, an operating lease might be appealing. In these lease situations, balance sheet concerns may trump the desire to obtain the lowest lease rate. In choosing a lease form, look at the period of intended equipment use, the potential for equipment obsolescence, balance sheet considerations, income tax considerations and any other factors that might influence lease choice.
Failing to Evaluate Vendor Service - Equipment Lease Arrangements
Entering into a hell or high water’ equipment lease involving proprietary equipment required for a multi-year service (such as alternative energy or telephone services) can lead your firm into a situation ripe for blunder. Even under the best of circumstances, a hell or high water’ equipment lease (one requiring non-cancelable payments) entered into in connection with a service arrangement carries a certain degree of risk. In many cases, the lease is provided by a leasing company independent from the service provider or later sold by the service provider to a lessor. The potential pitfall results from the possibility that your company might get stuck making lease payments for equipment it can no longer use, should the service provider fail or cease to offer the service. The best protection against this potential pitfall is to avoid these types of arrangements. If you must enter into such an arrangement, make sure the service provider is financially sound, reputable, and has a long track record of providing excellent service. Also, since these transactions always carry some risk, make sure that an abrupt interruption in the service will not have a material negative impact on your company or cause financial hardship.
Ignoring End-of-lease Notice Deadline
While not a deadly blunder, failing to give timely notice at the end of your lease can create significant additional lease expense for your firm if you plan to return the equipment. Many leases have provisions that require the lessee to notify the lessor of the lessee’s decision to return the equipment at the end of the lease. If you violate the notice period, the lease kicks into an often unfavorable automatic renewal period, usually one to six months. If you intend to return the equipment at lease end, make sure your firm gives notice on time. It can save your firm a bundle in avoidable lease expense.
Underestimating Time Required to Close Lease
Not allowing enough time to go through the lease planning, proposal, approval and documentation phases can result in extra cost. A rushed process can lead to poor lessor selection, approval delays, documentation miscues or poorly negotiated lease terms. Except in small ticket transactions (under $ 75,000 to $ 100,000) where personal guarantees of the principals are involved, most lease transactions take at least three weeks or more to close. While some of the time is consumed in the bidding and credit review processes, much of it can be eaten up by administrative matters. Obtaining insurance certificates, filing UCC financing statements, reviewing and negotiating the lease agreement, all contribute to the time it takes to get to a lease closing. The best way to manage the lease closing process and to save precious time and money is to plan ahead. Make sure you establish criteria for the lease you are seeking, prepare a package containing information all bidders would want, obtain a lease closing list from each lease bidder, and respond to all requests/questions raised by bidding lessors on a timely basis.
While equipment leasing pitfalls can not always be avoided, you can take steps to prevent snags that can cost your firm a mint. Plan ahead and do your homework before launching the lease bidding process. Give high priority to selecting an experienced lease provider with high integrity and good expertise. Also, with lease transactions that represent significant obligations for your firm, engage a competent attorney to help you review and negotiate the equipment lease.
George A. Parker
The Chinese media criticize the meeting of the French president Sarkozy with the Dalai llama
The Chinese media published a list of commentaries criticizing the meeting, in Poland during this weekend, of the French president Nicolas Sarkozy with the Dalai llama.
The People's Daily, newspaper of the Chinese Communist Party (CPC), Sunday published a commentary declaring that the goal of the meeting of Sarkozy with the Dalai llama, to the contempt of the opposition of China, was to divert the attention of a national stagnant economy, of a rate of elevated unemployment and a decline in support for his / her / its presidency.
"Sarkozy is absolutely mistaken in his / her / its calculations when he tried to undermine the fundamental interests of China in return for a gain of popularity, what will finally harm to the interests of the population in France and in Europe," the newspaper written .
Sarkozy conversed one half-hour with the Dalai llama Saturday in Gdansk in Poland as French president. He / it thus became the first European state chief to meet the Dalai llama as president in exercise of the European Union (EU).
The meeting provoked repeated representations by the Chinese part.
Oriental Outlook, a popular weekly, wrote Monday: "the chiefs of France and the EU know the position and the attitude of China well on the issue of Tibet."
"China is always firmly himself opposite to all secessionist activities led by the Dalai llama, and to all contacts between the Dalai llama and the foreign leaders under any shape. Even though some of the EU citizens do not know the position of China on the question of Tibet, their chief, him, it surely knows, "pursues the weekly. "He / it is well known of the international community, of which France and the EU make part, that Tibet is a part of China and that the issue of Tibet is an interior complicates business," it adds.
China strongly protested Sunday against the meeting of the French president Nicolas Sarkozy with the Dalai llama, declaring that she "undermined the fundamental interests of China" seriously.
The Chinese vice-foreign minister of the Business Hey Yafei convened the ambassador of France in China, Herve Ladsous, and expressed the strong discontent of the Chinese part, indicate the Chinese foreign ministry of the Business.
China declared that "the French part had to assume all responsibilities in this business."
Learn how to use an ice cream maker for Eggnog Ice Cream with expert cooking tips
China has more than 300 million acroes of exploitable grasslands, distributed mainly throughout Inner Mongolia, the basin between the Tianshan and Altai mountains in Xinjiang and on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau.
China has great numbers of over 400 species of domestic animals, including pigs, cattle, sheep, horses, donkeys, mules, camels, chickens, ducks, geese and rabbits. Since 1978, animal husbandry has developed rapidly; the outputs of meat, eggs, milk and leather products have doubled and redoubled, and they have been exported in large quantities.
The pep ready to reduce the production to sustain oil
The continuous decrease of the prices of the barrel of oil - fallen Thursday October 9 to 86,59 dollars, in New York, and to 82,66 dollars, in London - woke up the old concerns of the organization of the countries exporters of oil (OPEC), very heedful on the courses since the oil counter-shock of the years 1985-2000.
Without waiting for the summit foreseen December 17 in Oran (Algeria), his/her/its twelve members decided to meet November 18 in the seat of the cartel, in Vienna. They will debate the financial crisis, the world economic situation and his/her/its impact on the market", announced the general secretariat of the organization. In clear, of a possible decrease of the production, that would avoid that the strong fold of the demand of raw in the industrialized countries (United States, Europe, Japan) doesn't accentuate the fall of the prices. The announcement of the extraordinary meeting didn't prevent their receding: the barrel of Brent fell to 79 dollars, Friday morning, in Asia. a variety of standard and custom designed diesel generator,power generator,gasoline generator,portable generator,gas powered water pump and plate compactor to worldwide market with extensive experience. We have abundant capital and handle our own product development, production and after- sales service. .......
Of the members of the OPEC as Iran and Venezuela, whose political stability depends on the public subsidies financed by the oil returns, asked insistently for this summit. Besides the receding of the prices of the black gold, the producers face "the decrease of the value of the investments because of the world financial crisis", indicated to the AFP the president of the Libyan national Company of oil (NOC) and minister of oil. If the prices remain around 80 dollars, add Choker Ghana, "we consider reducing our production seriously and we call the other members of the OPEC, as the producers out OPEC (Russia, Norway, Mexico...), to reduce their production to protect their interests."
The financial storm risks to affect the profitability of the exploration-production projects, whose costs exploded these last years because of the enhancement of the raw materials (steel...), of the shortage of facilities and the technical difficulties (offshore deep, bituminous sands...). Besides, the crisis reduced the value of the financial assets of the countries producers, the petrol-monarchies of the Gulf being the more exposed.
Since his/her/its record of July 11 to 147,50 dollars, the price of the barrel lowered of near 50%. To what level can he/it stabilize? The speculative movements and the unceasing round-trips of the investors on the raw return the difficult answer. Lately, the bank business Merrill Lynch didn't exclude a floor of 50 dollars, his/her/its level of beginning 2005. This doorstep is unacceptable for all countries producers. Today, Iran and Venezuela defend a price floor of 100 dollars, while the president of the OPEC, the Algerian Khaki Hell, spoke lately of 80 dollars.
If the demand of products manufactured come from continuous Asia to lower, the recession in the OECD zone (Organization of cooperation and economic development) will have an impact on the production (notably Chinese) and therefore on the consumption of oil. The Center heart Global Energy Studies of London indicated, in September, that "the contribution of China to the growth of the demand seems about to vacillate." But the decrease of the oil prices would be also a good point for the resumption of the growth.